The Hyper-Polarization Challenge to the Conflict Resolution Field: A Joint BI/CRQ Discussion
BI and the Conflict Resolution Quarterly invite you to participate in an online exploration of what those with conflict and peacebuilding expertise can do to help defend liberal democracies and encourage them live up to their ideals.
Follow BI and the Hyper-Polarization Discussion on BI's New Substack Newsletter.
|Ron Fisher describes Track I-II coordination in Tajikistan.|
|Tamra d'Estrée illustrates how different processes are more appropriate at different phases of a conflict and accomplish different goals. Sometimes they are used sequentially; sometimes simultaneously for best results.|
|Joshua Weiss, Associate Director, Global Negotiation Project, Program on Negotiation, Harvard University, discusses his research that suggests a gradual approach to negotiation that tackles the less contentious issues first is not the only way forward.|
|William Zartman describes his concept of "formula" as a way of approaching the sequencing of negotiations.|
|Ron Fisher describes the importance of pre-negotiation interventions in intractable conflict.|
|Joshua Weiss, Associate Director, Global Negotiation Project, Program on Negotiation, Harvard University, gives some brief examples of three models of negotiation sequencing and discusses from ideas about the circumstances in which different sequencing might be most beneficial.|
|Morton Deutsch talks about how to sequence negotiations to increase the likelihood of a successful outcome.|
|Joshua Weiss, Associate Director, Global Negotiation Project, Program on Negotiation, Harvard University, describes three models of negotiation sequencing: incremental, the "boulder in the road" approach, and the committee approach.|